Category: rr18 Berkano
Unlike dum Bee that collects,
“What we need are more people who specialize in the impossible.” rr18ohh
— Theodore Roethke
To have dun Opportunity to practice onem True Spiritual Discipline,
form onem True Spiritual Master is almost Impossible luckily dir Impossible is just one Possibility.
Ich om dom Impossible
Ich om dom Impossible
Ich om dom Impossible
[[English: To have the opportunity to practice a true spiritual discipline from a true spiritual master is almost impossible luckily the impossible is just one possibility.
I am the impossible ]]
rr18 is Pregnant because it is full of Possibilities. rr18 is No-Thing-ness because it is not restricted so thot it has don Possibility to manifest don Impossible. If you have unen Blank Screen then it’s at it’s fullness in Possibilities. Once you draw one Dot on it you limit it’s Possibilities.
EXCERPTS: [[notes]] & color added
The birthday of the world / pregnant with possibility
We hear the shofar and call out, “Hayom Harat Olam! / Today is the birthday of the world; Today the world is born!”
…
But let’s look more closely at these words, to see what they can teach us.
Harah means pregnancy, conception or gestation. Not birth, but the process which leads up to birth. Olam can mean world, but if we wanted to say “the conception of the world,” we would say harat ha-olam. Olam really means eternity, from the root that means “hidden,” or more precisely, the infinite that is hidden, beyond our limited perception.
If we wanted to say “the birth of the world” we would say yaldat ha’olam. [[see rr01 Fehu]] Harat Olam means very literally, “pregnant with eternity”, or “eternally pregnant.” [[see rr12 Eternal Return]] Today is pregnant with eternity.”
[[from http://velveteenrabbi.blogs.com/blog/2008/09/the-birthday-of-the-world-pregnant-with-possibility.html]]
Mistiks are din only People Ik know who want to grow up TOBE NO-THING. Dæær main Block, is that eet takes æænen Lot dææs hard Work when duur current Zeitgeist is ruthlessly Hostile. –Tiwaz 201105031904 rr18uoh
(Mystics are the only people I know who want to grow up TOBE NO-THING. The main block, is that it takes a lot of hard work when the current zeitgeist is ruthlessly hostile.)
Out of Birthing pure Filth,
Coagulating Snakes of d Night,
Sperm d Alchemical Elixir,
That births an Immortal Light.
–Tiwaz 201104230351 for Gidget rr18eoh
Dor Silence is don great Cosmic Gift,
Chattering Words deceive,
Occulting Ot’s Spiritual Wholeness,
Thot all Life can receive.
–Tiwaz 201104221132 rr18auu
Everyone has Answers, few have Questions n fewer have Silence. Luckily for my Friends, I’m not Enlightened or I would have NO-THING to say. rr18auu
“How the Globalist’s PR Agents Use the Wikileaks Psyops Program” by Scott Creighton
Julian Assange Wikileaks_org
“Michel Chossudovsky over at Global Research has put up an interesting NPR transcript with some rather revealing statements about Wikileaks that were made by the New York Times chief Washington correspondent, David Sanger. Sanger is one of the New York Times reporters who have been reading and writing about the different state department memos “leaked” by Wikileaks. He was also involved in meetings with the Obama administration and others which selected and redacted the cables that would be published.”
"New York Times" Motto
“Another statement is interesting because it shows that the New York Times didn’t get their “leaks” from Wikileaks, but instead they got them from The Guardian, another globalist controlled publication. You would think that something as big as the Wikileaks, the Guardian might want to keep the exclusive for themselves. Imagine all that money they gave up handing over these “leaks” to the New York Times. Makes one think that there was a larger agenda at work. Now remember, Wikileaks didn’t just publish these things themselves, instead, for some reason, they handed them over (supposedly) to the Guardian and let them edit them and select them as they saw fit. If Assange didn’t see that coming, if he didn’t KNOW that the globalist institutions would use these documents in this way prior to his handing them over, he’s an idiot.”
This Article by Scott Creighton has a Silver Lining. It is a Victory for Freedom. D Key to understanding this is, like Alex Jones says it is a “War for your Mind”. D general Public r influenced by Opinion Makers. Opinion Makers r no longer getting their info from d Main Stream Media like d NYT because they have access to d Net.
No Mater what happens d Ruling Elite need to control Peoples Thoughts. If they have to tell d Truth to retain that control they will do it. In other Words they will give up d Gold to save d Golden Goose which is d Main Stream Media (MSM) including Hollywood, Music n now they want to start controlling d Net.
David E. Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent for The New York Times
D Ruling Elite r using Assange to legitimize their Information by giving us Truths. Just like CON Artist they will try to sucker us in by building up CON-fidence. Then at d Crucial Moment they will use a Lie or even a Truth, to trap us. This Scenario is Standard Operating Procedure for Con Artists n Black Ops but it also shows that d Ruling Elite r losing Ground in d War for our Minds. We must be vigil n not fall for their Media Mind Matrix that keeps us shackled as Chattel. rr18æih
Anyone who wants to understand d Role of d MSM especially d New York Times should read Noam Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent” or see d Movie.
REFERENCE: How the Globalist’s PR Agents Use the Wikileaks Psyops Program –Scott Creighton http://www.infowars.com/how-the-globalist%E2%80%99s-pr-agents-use-the-wikileaks-psyops-program/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
A master should not speak anything that is not deeply rooted in his mind, in his experience; that he has not known, he should not speak. He should only speak that which he has known, for which he can stand the witness, for which he can say, ‘I am the witness’ – only that.”
(pp. 34, Rajneesh’s Vedanta, c1978 ISBN 0880501669)
“My emphasis is not on the approach; my emphasis is on the disciple. … Hinduism cannot be a world religion, Buddhism cannot e a world religion. Up till now there exists no religion which can be a world religion, because every religion chooses one approach.” (rr17ae, rr09ae)
“Whatsoever I am saying can be a world-comprehensive thing, because I don’t choose any approach. All approaches lead to the same goal.” I have not a fixed approach. When a different type of person comes to me, I immediately change my approach. I always adjusts to the person. I never try the reverse. I never try to adjust the person with an approach. To me that looks absurd. (rr17ae, rr09ae)
“I don’t make ready-made clothes for you and then say, ‘Cut your legs a little because the dress …’ I always cut the dress immediately if I feel it doesn’t suit you. The dress is wrong, you are never wrong.” (rr17ae, rr09ae)
(Rajneesh’s Vedanta, (Side Jackets) c1978 ISBN 0880501669)
“Ordinarily we use words without moving with them – even such beautiful words as ‘love.’ We go on saying to people, ‘I love you,’ not meaning it at all. You may not even be aware of what you are saying. If you were aware, you would be very guarded. How can you say such a sacred word, ‘love’, so easily? Or go on saying, ‘I love my car, I love my dog, I love my wife.’ You can love anything – even chocolate, ice-cream. Your love is not rooted any-where; you are not moving in it. How can a man love ice-cream? And if you can love ice-cream, then whenever you say ‘I love’ it is not reliable. Then don’t say ‘I love’ to any person, because no person would like to become like ice-cream or chocolate.” (rr01aei)
But we go on using words, not to express something, but on the contrary, to hide something. Just watch: when you say to someone, ‘I love you,’ you may be just hiding hate. It was so bubbling you were afraid the other may come to know it, immediately you have to hide it: you say, ‘I love you.’ This must be some type of screen, some form of hiding, suppression.” (rr01aei)
(35, Rajneesh’s Vedanta, c1978 ISBN 0880501669)